Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
Median Income: $64,231
Population: 429,954
Median Income: $69,778
Population: 3,979,576
When comparing Minneapolis and Los Angeles, the overall cost of living differs by 50.9%. Los Angeles carries a cost index of 166 compared to Minneapolis's 110, meaning your dollar stretches 34% further in Minneapolis.
Housing is where the most significant gap appears between these two cities. Minneapolis has a housing index of 118 compared to Los Angeles's 208. This 90-point difference translates to substantial monthly savings on rent or mortgage payments in Minneapolis.
Minneapolis is more affordable for: Housing, Food & Groceries, Transportation, Healthcare, Utilities, Entertainment, Taxes.
If you earn $60,000 in Minneapolis, you would need $90,545 in Los Angeles to maintain the same standard of living. For a $100,000 salary, the equivalent would be $150,909.
The median household income in Minneapolis is $64,231 compared to $69,778 in Los Angeles. Los Angeles has higher incomes, though the higher cost of living may offset this advantage.
Safety: Minneapolis scores 5/10 while Los Angeles scores 5/10 in our safety assessment.
Weather: Los Angeles enjoys better weather with a score of 9/10 versus Minneapolis's 2/10.
Job Market: Both cities have comparable job markets at 8/10.
Minneapolis is the more affordable option overall, but cost is just one factor in deciding where to live. Consider your career opportunities, family needs, and lifestyle preferences alongside the financial comparison. Los Angeles may justify its higher costs with a thriving job market that many residents find worthwhile.
