Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
Median Income: $58,290
Population: 486,051
Median Income: $69,778
Population: 3,979,576
When comparing Omaha and Los Angeles, the overall cost of living differs by 95.3%. Los Angeles carries a cost index of 166 compared to Omaha's 85, meaning your dollar stretches 49% further in Omaha.
Housing is where the most significant gap appears between these two cities. Omaha has a housing index of 78 compared to Los Angeles's 208. This 130-point difference translates to substantial monthly savings on rent or mortgage payments in Omaha.
Omaha is more affordable for: Housing, Food & Groceries, Transportation, Healthcare, Utilities, Entertainment, Taxes.
If you earn $60,000 in Omaha, you would need $117,176 in Los Angeles to maintain the same standard of living. For a $100,000 salary, the equivalent would be $195,294.
The median household income in Omaha is $58,290 compared to $69,778 in Los Angeles. Los Angeles has higher incomes, though the higher cost of living may offset this advantage.
Safety: Omaha scores 6/10 while Los Angeles scores 5/10 in our safety assessment.
Weather: Los Angeles enjoys better weather with a score of 9/10 versus Omaha's 4/10.
Job Market: Los Angeles has the stronger job market (8/10) compared to Omaha (7/10).
Omaha is the more affordable option overall, but cost is just one factor in deciding where to live. Consider your career opportunities, family needs, and lifestyle preferences alongside the financial comparison. Los Angeles may justify its higher costs with a thriving job market that many residents find worthwhile.
