Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
Median Income: $56,274
Population: 641,903
Median Income: $69,778
Population: 3,979,576
When comparing Las Vegas and Los Angeles, the overall cost of living differs by 62.7%. Los Angeles carries a cost index of 166 compared to Las Vegas's 102, meaning your dollar stretches 39% further in Las Vegas.
Housing is where the most significant gap appears between these two cities. Las Vegas has a housing index of 105 compared to Los Angeles's 208. This 103-point difference translates to substantial monthly savings on rent or mortgage payments in Las Vegas.
Las Vegas is more affordable for: Housing, Food & Groceries, Transportation, Healthcare, Utilities, Entertainment, Taxes.
If you earn $60,000 in Las Vegas, you would need $97,647 in Los Angeles to maintain the same standard of living. For a $100,000 salary, the equivalent would be $162,745.
The median household income in Las Vegas is $56,274 compared to $69,778 in Los Angeles. Los Angeles has higher incomes, though the higher cost of living may offset this advantage.
Safety: Las Vegas scores 5/10 while Los Angeles scores 5/10 in our safety assessment.
Weather: Los Angeles enjoys better weather with a score of 9/10 versus Las Vegas's 7/10.
Job Market: Los Angeles has the stronger job market (8/10) compared to Las Vegas (7/10).
Las Vegas is the more affordable option overall, but cost is just one factor in deciding where to live. Consider your career opportunities, family needs, and lifestyle preferences alongside the financial comparison. Los Angeles may justify its higher costs with a thriving job market that many residents find worthwhile.
