Side-by-side cost of living comparison for 2026
Median Income: $56,274
Population: 641,903
Median Income: $65,781
Population: 2,693,976
When comparing Las Vegas and Chicago, the overall cost of living differs by 9.8%. Chicago carries a cost index of 112 compared to Las Vegas's 102, meaning your dollar stretches 9% further in Las Vegas.
Housing is where the most significant gap appears between these two cities. Las Vegas has a housing index of 105 compared to Chicago's 118. This 13-point difference translates to substantial monthly savings on rent or mortgage payments in Las Vegas.
Las Vegas is more affordable for: Housing, Food & Groceries, Transportation, Healthcare, Entertainment, Taxes.
Chicago is more affordable for: Utilities.
If you earn $60,000 in Las Vegas, you would need $65,882 in Chicago to maintain the same standard of living. For a $100,000 salary, the equivalent would be $109,804.
The median household income in Las Vegas is $56,274 compared to $65,781 in Chicago. Chicago has higher incomes, though the higher cost of living may offset this advantage.
Safety: Las Vegas scores 5/10 while Chicago scores 4/10 in our safety assessment.
Weather: Las Vegas has an edge in climate with a 7/10 weather score compared to Chicago's 4/10.
Job Market: Both cities have comparable job markets at 7/10.
Las Vegas is the more affordable option overall, but cost is just one factor in deciding where to live. Consider your career opportunities, family needs, and lifestyle preferences alongside the financial comparison. Chicago may justify its higher costs with unique cultural amenities that many residents find worthwhile.
